For product managers
Ready to ship. Waiting on a review?
Replace status-watching with a release decision you can actually read: what changed, what it touches, and the one product question that still needs a human answer.
Release decision · PR #207
Clarify workspace role invitations · 2 files changed
Scope
Workspace invitations now explain when a teammate is pending.
Invite copy names the workspace and selected role before acceptance.
Side effects
Pending invites stay visible to workspace admins.
Existing members and accepted invites keep their current access.
One question
Does an invited teammate know what access they will receive?
Your answer stays attached to the commit as the product decision.
Illustrative brief · decision remains human
Product’s lane in review
Approve the business logic. Leave implementation checks to the engineer.
A useful review separates the decision you own from the checks your engineering partner already has in hand.
Business logic approval
Confirm that the behavior matches the release intent and the customer promise.
- Scope matches the launch
- Customer-facing copy is accurate
- Rollout dependency is understood
Engineer checks
Keep technical correctness visible without asking product to impersonate a code reviewer.
- Changed-file evidence is available; engineers verify tests
- Side effects are named
- Open implementation risk is explicit
The question worth answering
“Does the invite explain the access this teammate will receive?”
That is the kind of decision a product review should surface. It gives the engineer a useful answer and gives the team a record of why the workspace change is ready.
Scope
Which customer promise changed?
Side effects
Where else will this behavior appear?
Decision
What does the team still need from a person?
Make the release question visible.
Join the private beta. The founder will personally onboard your first workspace and review flow.